A Son’s Death Didn’t Make a Critic ‘Credible’

Over on Twitter, Glenn Greenwald recommended this USA Today profile of Boston University historian Andrew Bacevich, who has been one of the most prolific and incisive critics of U.S. foreign policy in recent years. Greenwald called it “surprisingly good,” which is right. But one thing about the piece really bothered me–how it dealt with the death of Bacevich’s son in Iraq. Reporter Rick Hampson tells that story via the classroom: The students knew that Bacevich had always opposed the war in Iraq. They may have known that his only son, Lt. Andrew J. Bacevich, Jr., was an Army officer there. […]


The Washington Post’s Afghanistan Debate

The Washington Post had another “Topic A” feature onAugust 31, headlined “Is the War in Afghanistan Worth Fighting?” Acrucial debate, to be sure;the Post found one person (Andrew Bacevich) to argue that it is not, which is probably a position close to the majority view of the American public. That position is “balanced” by four contributors whoargue the war is worth fighting, in different ways or for different reasons. This imbalance echoes the Post‘sprevious presentationof the Afghanistan debate, showing once again that the paper seems to believe that a public that increasingly sees the war as a lost cause needs […]