Extra! July/August 1998

    From the Top

    While David Croteau’s study demonstrates that Washington journalists are to the right of the general public on many economic issues, it needs to be stressed that the personal views of news reporters do not translate directly into the slant of news coverage. Reporters have editors or producers who play a key role in how the news is presented; these editors and producers in turn are overseen by higher-up news executives, part of a hierarchy that eventually culminates in the chief executive officer of the corporation that owns the news outlet. But those who specialize in scrutinizing the private opinions and …

    Field Guide to TV’s Lukewarm Liberals

    Pundit-watchers never tire of the sport of spotting establishment, status quo commentators posing in their none-too-convincing camouflage as representatives of the left. While right-winged pundits cackle in full-throated yelps and are frequently leaders of their flocks, the specimens that serve as their competition often have their left wing clipped, teeter precariously on the fence and sing out of both sides of their mouths. For those new to the joys of spotting TV’s tepid liberals, here’s a brief guide to some members of this plentiful species. (Spotting actual left-winged pundits in mainstream media is too difficult to be enjoyable for most …

    Meet the Myth-Makers

    While the main proponents of the liberal media myth are conservative commentators and talkshow hosts (who themselves are the dominant opinion voices in the media), the ammunition for such arguments usually comes from one of three well-funded groups. Two of the groups–Accuracy In Media (AIM) and the Media Research Center (MRC)–are openly conservative, while the Center for Media & Public Affairs (CMPA) presents itself as an objective, nonpartisan research group. AIM does relatively little research, while the plentiful “research” produced by the other two groups is frequently marred by methodological flaws or unsupportable assumptions. Despite the weak foundations of their …

    Doublethink on the Editorial Page

    If a newspaper has a political agenda, presumably it would be most visible on its editorial page. Examination of editorials in some of the most prominent dailies–the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Los Angeles Times and USA Today–on a range of economic and social issues shows that they tend to articulate the same centrist-to-right perspective that informs the rest of their reporting, preaching the social austerity and “free trade” policies popular with corporate elites and downplaying questions of systemic injustice and inequality not on the official agenda. The New York Times, Washington Post, L.A. Times and USA Today …

    Examining the ‘Liberal Media’ Claim

    [See the Extra! magazine report on this study: Challenging the “Liberal Media” Claim: On economics, journalists’ private views are to the right of public (July/August 1998) by David Croteau—Adobe reader required.] Executive Summary The conservative critique of the news media rests on two general propositions: (1) journalists’ views are to the left of the public, and (2) journalists frame news content in a way that accentuates these left perspectives. Previous research has revealed persuasive evidence against the latter claim, but the validity of the former claim has often been taken for granted. This research project examined the supposed left orientation …

Articles in the print edition

‘The 89 Percent Liberal Media’

In Search of the Liberal Media

by Robert Parry

The Right-Leaning Rolodex

by Sam Husseini and Norman Solomon

Where’s the Power: Newsroom or Boardroom?

Dewey Defeats Truman

Conservative Top 40

Limbaugh on the ‘Liberal Media’

Media: Liberal or Libertine?

by Jeff Cohen