Mar 8 2016

Washington Post Ran 16 Negative Stories on Bernie Sanders in 16 Hours

Negative stories on Bernie Sanders in the Washington Post

Fifteen of the 16 negative stories on the Bernie Sanders campaign that the Washington Post ran over a 16-hour period.

In what has to be some kind of record, the Washington Post ran 16 negative stories on Bernie Sanders in 16 hours, between roughly 10:20 PM EST Sunday, March 6, to 3:54 PM EST Monday, March 7—a window that includes the crucial Democratic debate in Flint, Michigan, and the next morning’s spin:

All of these posts paint his candidacy in a negative light, mainly by advancing the narrative that he’s a clueless white man incapable of winning over people of color or speaking to women. Even the one article about Sanders beating Trump implies this is somehow a surprise—despite the fact that Sanders consistently out-polls Hillary Clinton against the New York businessman.

There were two posts in this time frame that one could consider neutral: “These Academics Say Bernie Sanders’ College Plan Will Be a Boon for African-American Students, Will It?” and “Democratic Debate: Clinton, Sanders Spar Over Fracking, Gun Control, Trade and Jobs.” None could be read as positive.

While the headlines don’t necessarily reflect all the nuances of the text, as I’ve noted before, only 40 percent of the public reads past the headlines, so how a story is labeled is just as important, if not more so, than the substance of the story itself.

The Washington Post was sold in 2013 to libertarian Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos, who is worth approximately $49.8 billion.

Despite being ideologically opposed to the Democratic Party (at least in principle), Bezos has enjoyed friendly ties with both the Obama administration and the CIA. As Michael Oman-Reagan notes, Amazon was awarded a $16.5 million contract with the State Department the last year Clinton ran it. Amazon also has over $600 million in contracts with the Central Intelligence Agency, an organization Sanders said he wanted to abolish in 1974, and still says he “had a lot of problems with.” FAIR has previously criticized the Washington Post for failing to disclose, when reporting on tech giant Uber, that Bezos also owns more than $1 billion in Uber stock.

The Washington Post’s editorial stance has been staunchly anti-Sanders, though the paper contends that its editorial board is entirely independent of both Bezos and the paper’s news reporting.


Adam Johnson is a contributing analyst for FAIR.org. Follow him on Twitter at @AdamJohnsonNYC.

Messages can be sent to the Washington Post at letters@washpost.com, or via Twitter @washingtonpost. Please remember that respectful communication is the most effective.

 

 

 

Comments

  1. Boycott amazon and the post.. I am

Trackbacks

  1. […] close ties are especially unsettling on the heels of a primary season in which the corporate media attacked Bernie Sanders constantly, and the Democratic National Committee (DNC) was caught manipulating the media on […]

  2. […] visibility that the corporate newsfotainment industry provides. But it’s foolish to expect a fair hearing and assessment from that […]

  3. […] Source: Washington Post Ran 16 Negative Stories on Bernie Sanders in 16 Hours | FAIR […]

  4. […] MSNBC propaganda against Bernie? The hundreds of articles attacking Bernie from the New York Times, Washington Post, Think Progress, and Slate (and dozens more)? Even if you weren’t a Bernie supporter, come on, […]

  5. […] 16 hours, the Washington Post ran 16 pieces against Sanders. The New York Times’ systematic anti-Bernie Sanders biases have […]

  6. […] 16 hours, the Washington Post ran 16 pieces against Sanders. The New York Times’ systematic anti-Bernie Sanders biases have […]

  7. […] window overlapping March 6th and 7th, the Washington Post published a truly gobsmacking sixteen smear pieces on Bernie Sanders during what was arguably the single most heated period of the Democratic […]

  8. […] window overlapping March 6th and 7th, the Washington Post published a truly gobsmacking sixteen smear pieces on Bernie Sanders during what was arguably the single most heated period of the Democratic […]

  9. […] window overlapping March 6th and 7th, the Washington Post published a truly gobsmacking sixteen smear pieces on Bernie Sanders during what was arguably the single most heated period of the Democratic […]

  10. […] window overlapping March 6th and 7th, the Washington Post published a truly gobsmacking sixteen smear pieces on Bernie Sanders during what was arguably the single most heated period of the Democratic […]

  11. […] window overlapping March 6th and 7th, the Washington Post published a truly gobsmacking sixteen smear pieces on Bernie Sanders during what was arguably the single most heated period of the Democratic […]

  12. […] window overlapping March 6th and 7th, the Washington Post published a truly gobsmacking sixteen smear pieces on Bernie Sanders during what was arguably the single most heated period of the Democratic […]

  13. […] window overlapping March 6th and 7th, the Washington Post published a truly gobsmacking sixteen smear pieces on Bernie Sanders during what was arguably the single most heated period of the Democratic […]

  14. […] window overlapping March 6th and 7th, the Washington Post published a truly gobsmacking sixteen smear pieces on Bernie Sanders during what was arguably the single most heated period of the Democratic […]

  15. […] shilled for Hillary Clinton throughout her ugly, fear-mongering campaign, notably publishing sixteen negative pieces on Sanders in sixteen hours, or when it ran this piece on how Clinton might have been poisoned by secret Putinist agents […]

  16. […] shilled for Hillary Clinton throughout her ugly, fear-mongering campaign, notably publishing sixteen negative pieces on Sanders in sixteen hours, or when it ran this piece on how Clinton might have been poisoned by secret Putinist agents […]

  17. […] shilled for Hillary Clinton throughout her ugly, fear-mongering campaign, notably publishing sixteen negative pieces on Sanders in sixteen hours, or when it ran this piece on how Clinton might have been poisoned by secret Putinist agents […]

  18. […] shilled for Hillary Clinton throughout her ugly, fear-mongering campaign, notably publishing sixteen negative pieces on Sanders in sixteen hours, or when it ran this piece on how Clinton might have been poisoned by secret Putinist agents […]

  19. […] shilled for Hillary Clinton throughout her ugly, fear-mongering campaign, notably publishing sixteen negative pieces on Sanders in sixteen hours, or when it ran this piece on how Clinton might have been poisoned by secret Putinist agents […]

  20. […] shilled for Hillary Clinton throughout her ugly, fear-mongering campaign, notably publishing sixteen negative pieces on Sanders in sixteen hours, or when it ran this piece on how Clinton might have been poisoned by secret Putinist agents […]

  21. […] shilled for Hillary Clinton throughout her ugly, fear-mongering campaign, notably publishing sixteen negative pieces on Sanders in sixteen hours, or when it ran this piece on how Clinton might have been poisoned by secret Putinist agents […]

  22. […] shilled for Hillary Clinton throughout her ugly, fear-mongering campaign, notably publishing sixteen negative pieces on Sanders in sixteen hours, or when it ran this piece on how Clinton might have been poisoned by secret Putinist agents […]

  23. […] shilled for Hillary Clinton throughout her ugly, fear-mongering campaign, notably publishing sixteen negative pieces on Sanders in sixteen hours, or when it ran this piece on how Clinton might have been poisoned by secret Putinist agents … […]

  24. […] the DNC and news outlets were in cahoots against Bernie Sanders during the primaries. In fact, during one 16-hour period, the Washington Post managed to publish 16 negative Bernie Sanders stories. This is the same paper, […]

  25. […] Clinton tout au longue de sa hideuse campagne de terrorisme intellectuel, notamment en publiant seize articles négatifs contre Sanders en seize heures, ou lorsqu’il a publié un article sur la façon dont Clinton aurait pu avoir été […]

  26. […] Clinton tout au longue de sa hideuse campagne de terrorisme intellectuel, notamment en publiant seize articles négatifs contre Sanders en seize heures, ou lorsqu’il a publié un article sur la façon dont Clinton aurait pu avoir été empoisonnée […]

  27. […] Clinton tout au longue de sa hideuse campagne de terrorisme intellectuel, notamment en publiant seize articles négatifs contre Sanders en seize heures, ou lorsqu’il a publié un article sur la façon dont Clinton aurait pu avoir été […]

  28. […] Clinton tout au longue de sa hideuse campagne de terrorisme intellectuel, notamment en publiant seize articles négatifs contre Sanders en seize heures, ou lorsqu’il a publié un article sur la façon dont Clinton aurait pu avoir été empoisonnée […]

  29. […] shilled for Hillary Clinton throughout her ugly, fear-mongering campaign, notably publishing sixteen negative pieces on Sanders in sixteen hours, or when it ran this piece on how Clinton might have been poisoned by secret Putinist agents … […]

  30. […] Clinton tout au longue de sa hideuse campagne de terrorisme intellectuel, notamment en publiant seize articles négatifs contre Sanders en seize heures, ou lorsqu’il a publié un article sur la façon dont Clinton aurait pu avoir été empoisonnée […]

  31. […] a Trump, acumula un año de periodismo nefasto tras realizar una cobertura de campaña sesgada y publicar artículos difamatorios […]

  32. […] “down-ballot” races and help their preferred candidates overwhelm any opposition. Others like Amazon’s Jeff Bezos and gaming magnate Sheldon Adelson buy their own high-profile daily newspapers. Still others like […]

  33. […] Clinton tout au long de sa hideuse campagne de terrorisme intellectuel, notamment en publiant seize articles négatifs contre Sanders en seize heures, ou lorsqu’il a publié un article sur la façon dont Clinton aurait pu avoir été empoisonnée […]

  34. […] the stage, is a paper with a serious animus against the junior senator from Vermont—once running 16 negative stories on Sanders in 16 hours, and on another occasion squeezing four separate Sanders-bashing articles […]

Speak Your Mind

*