A potential attack by Al-Qaeda, accompanied by red and orange shockwaves of terror, provided an urgent lead for Fox Special Report on July 26, 2007. The news? A claimed glitch in the program of electronic surveillance established for collecting foreign intelligence. The law needed an immediate "fix," host Brit Hume said. "The nation's intelligence chief urgently pleads with Congress to fix the laws which he says are roadblocks to listening in on two-way communications between foreign terror suspects overseas," said Hume. "And he points to the recent National Intelligence Estimate about al Qaeda's rebuilding as part of his argument." "Terrorists" [...]
Wiretapping Americans for foreign intelligence
Scandals are non-stories for 'America's Mayor'
Does Republican presidential hopeful Rudolph Giuliani have some dirt on the press corps? How else to explain the free pass journalists have repeatedly granted him on stories that would threaten to sink less-favored candidates, particularly of the Democratic variety? (See sidebar.) If Ronald Reagan was the “Teflon president” to whom no bad news would stick, then Giuliani would seem to be the Teflon candidate. Consider Giuliani’s campaign in South Carolina, perhaps the most important primary in the GOP schedule, and the state on which Giuliani has pinned his hopes for the nomination. In June, Giuliani state campaign chair and South [...]
Demonstrators Not Our Kind On NBC Nightly News (9/15/07), reporter Patty Culhane dismissed the September 15 anti-war protests, saying, "Some say demonstrations like this will have little effect." "Some" turns out to be pollster Stuart Rothenberg, who said, "The kind of people who have impact are middle-class Americans, many of whom are inclined to support the president." Rothenberg doesn’t specify whether protesters have too much money to matter or not enough. But what polls is he reading that find "many" Americans of whatever economic class supporting Bush or his Iraq policy? We know that the middle class is shrinking, but [...]
The DDT Debate The quality of the science in Aaron Swartz’s article on DDT (Extra!, 9-10/07) is exceptionally poor. It suggests a lack of understanding of the issue. The inaccuracies are numerous; in fact, virtually every statement is at best slanted. For instance, “there is no global ban on DDT” is at best deliberately misleading. It is banned in all U.S. programs, which means programs funded by the U.S., and until September 14, 2006, it was also banned in U.N. programs. In other words, virtually all programs that could possibly impact Third World malaria rates had to be done without [...]