In the wars of the 1980s and '90s, military planners placed considerable emphasis on controlling the information that reached the American public. Journalists were excluded from the wars in Grenada and Panama until the fighting was already concluded. This in turn led to complaints from journalists, and in the 1990 war in Iraq, code-named Operation Desert Storm, the Pentagon adopted a "pool system" through which a handpicked group of reporters was allowed to travel with soldiers under tightly controlled conditions. Between August 1990 and January 1991 only the "combat pools"—about 23 groups of reporters —were allowed access to military units [...]
Sep
01
2003
Right Too Soon?
To media, Scott Ritter was "drinking Saddam's Kool-Aid"
Scott Ritter, the former United Nations weapons inspector, spent the last several years telling anyone who would listen that Iraq probably did not possess any significant quantities of banned weapons. We now know that Ritter was most likely correct; U.S. forces occupying Iraq since late March have failed to find any weapons of mass destruction. Iraqi scientists interviewed since the war ended have almost unanimously agreed that all such weapons were destroyed years ago. In late July (7/24/03), former CIA Director John Deutsch told a Senate intelligence panel that it "seems increasingly likely" that "after 1991 in the Gulf War, [...]
Sep
01
2003
From Media War Boosters, Few Apologies
Being pro-war means never having to say you're sorry
The superstar columnist George Will has an impressive vocabulary. Too bad it doesn't include the words "I'm sorry." Last year, Will led the media charge when a member of Congress dared to say that George W. Bush would try to deceive the public about Iraq. By now, of course, strong evidence has piled up that Bush tried and succeeded. But back in late September, when a media frenzy erupted right after Rep. Jim McDermott (D.-Wash.) appeared live from Baghdad on ABC's This Week program (9/29/02), what riled the punditocracy as much as anything else was McDermott's last statement during the [...]
Sep
01
2003
Guest Perspective: Inside the Cable Beast
A journalist recalls an atmosphere of ignorance and bigotry
By Manal Ismail
To mark that momentous day in April when invading U.S. forces captured the Iraqi capital, my boss, second-in-command at a major cable news network, decided to buy his staff lunch. "Pizza and Salad," he announced in an email to the newsroom, while on our air jubilant Iraqis hacked away at a statue of Saddam Hussein. The occasion? "To celebrate the fall of Baghdad." Producers and reporters, tense after weeks of covering an action-packed military campaign, were delighted. As the only Arab at my network, and one of the few employees critical of the war, I cringed at the thought of [...]
Sep
01
2003
The Hypocrisy of George Will
Pundit's double standards, ethical lapses seldom noted
When Republican senators filibustered President Clinton's economic stimulus bill in 1993, columnist George Will vigorously defended the Senate rule that requires the votes of at least 60 senators, a so-called supermajority, to impose an end to debate. In a column headlined "The Framers' Intent" (Washington Post, 4/25/93), Will praised "the right of a minority to use extended debate to obstruct Senate action" and he cheered "the generation that wrote and ratified the Constitution" for properly establishing "the Senate's permissive tradition regarding extended debates." Dismissing a liberal critic of the rule, Will wrote: "The Senate is not obligated to jettison one [...]
Sep
01
2003
Inventing Africa
New York Times archives reveal a history of racist fabrication
When New York Times reporters such as Lloyd Garrison in the 1960s and Joseph Lelyveld in the 1980s filed news stories from Africa, editors at the Times routinely fabricated scenes and manufactured quotes for their articles. In some instances, the foreign editor colluded with the reporter to manufacture scenes that they believed would conform to the racist stereotypical biases that U.S. readers had come to expect in reports from Africa. When I brought these examples of racist journalistic concoctions to the attention of New York Times editors more than 10 years ago, I was virtually ignored. That's why recent assertions [...]
Sep
01
2003
Don't Follow the Money
The self-destruct provision
By Dean Baker
In All the President's Men, Carl Woodward and Bob Bernstein's classic account of the Watergate scandal, their secret inside source, "Deep Throat," repeatedly told them to "follow the money." But when it came to reporting on the debate over a Medicare prescription drug benefit, the New York Times and Washington Post repeatedly told readers not to follow the money. In article after article, readers were told that politicians were motivated by ideological conviction, rather than the desire to please rich and powerful political backers. For example, the New York Times (6/22/03) presented an overview of the Congressional debate in which [...]
Sep
01
2003
Weeding the Field
Press tries to determine who should and shouldn't run for president
Ten years ago, political science professor Thomas Patterson argued in his book Out of Order that the "road to nomination" for potential U.S. presidential candidates "now runs through the newsrooms." In particular, he asserted, "the press performs the party's traditional role of screening potential nominees for the presidency--deciding which ones are worthy of serious consideration by the electorate and which ones can be dismissed as also-rans." In addition, he proposed, journalists choose a "prevailing story line" around which news about candidates is framed. Patterson's observations aptly describe current media coverage of the nine Democratic candidates for their party's nomination. Some, [...]
