Jan 5 2007

Best of CounterSpin 2006

By

Download MP3 On this special Best of CounterSpin, program we look back over some of what was news for the mainstream media in 2006—and some of what wasn’t news, but should’ve been. Our guests this year included a range of activists, researchers and journalists—all of whom had an angle on events that we thought worth hearing and, more often than not, one you weren’t hearing many other places. Whether the issue was medicare or immigration, Wal-Mart or welfare policy, each in his or her way reminded us of the need to see beyond the narrow, often distorted dialog provided by […]

May 6 2005

Dean Baker on Social Security, Rory O’Connor on CPB

Download MP3 This week on CounterSpin: The debate over Social Security privatization will be heating up again now that George W. Bush is endorsing a specific proposal. Are the media sorting out the truth about Bush’s push for so-called progressive indexation? Does the math really show that Bush is, as one New York Times column put it, Robin Hood? We’ll get the details from Dean Baker, co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research. Also on the show: The conservative cat seems to be further out of the bag at CPB. Now PBS president Pat Mitchell is being criticized […]

Apr 1 2005

CBS’s Pro-Privatization Predictions

CBS Evening News has presented two segments in recent weeks (2/9/05, 3/4/05) that purport to show how typical American workers would fare under George W. Bush’s plan to privatize Social Security. But the segments rely on stock market projections that, if true, would make any “crisis” in Social Security almost impossible. CBS reporter Jim Axelrod first profiled (2/9/05) Jama Whitesell, a 28-year-old receptionist making $32,000 a year. Axelrod went to a financial planner who predicted that a private account would be a safe bet for this worker–based on a projected 8 percent return on the private account. Why did CBS […]

Mar 10 2005

Times Responds on Social Security Semantics

On January 27, FAIR issued an action alert on the New York Times‘ and AP‘s use of the White House-friendly phrase “personal accounts” to describe Bush’s privatization plan. On March 6, Times public editor Daniel Okrent devoted part of his column to responding to FAIR activists and others on this issue. FAIR replied in its online Media Views feature, a daily compendium of media criticism and analysis. Okrent’s comment was: “Now a rugby scrum has gathered around the Bush Social Security plan. Republicans tout ‘personal accounts’; Democrats trash ‘private accounts.’ In this atmosphere, I don’t think reporters have much choice […]

Mar 8 2005

CBS Offers Misleading Pro-Privatization Predictions

CBS Evening News has presented two segments in recent weeks (2/9/05, 3/4/05) that purport to show how typical American workers would fare under George W. Bush’s plan to privatize Social Security. But the segments rely on stock market projections that, if true, would make any “crisis” in Social Security almost impossible. CBS reporter Jim Axelrod first profiled (2/9/05) Jama Whitesell, a 28-year-old receptionist making $32,000 a year. Axelrod went to a financial planner who predicted that a private account would be a safe bet for this worker– based on a projected 8 percent return on the private account. Why did […]

Feb 14 2005

USA Today Responds on Social Security Criticism

On February 7, FAIR issued an action alert criticizing USA Today‘s re-writing of George W. Bush‘s Social Security rhetoric. Bush has said a number of times that the system will be “flat bust,” “exhausted” and “bankrupt” in the year 2042. In describing Bush’s position, USA Today changed those misleading claims, reporting that Bush has said that Social Security “won’t have enough money to pay promised benefits in 2042,” and “Bush says that in 2042, it won’t be able to pay 100 percent of guaranteed benefits.” As FAIR argued, USA Today effectively changed Bush’s inaccurate claims into more accurate– though still […]

Feb 7 2005

USA Today Covers for Bush’s Social Security Distortion

NOTE: Please see the update to this alert. In its February 3 edition, USA Today not only failed to challenge a George W. Bush distortion about Social Security— it actually changed Bush’s remarks to make them more accurate. Summarizing Bush’s case for privatizing the program, reporter Judy Keen explained: “Two days after winning re-election, Bush said his top priority would be Social Security, which he says will go into the red in 2018 and won’t have enough money to pay promised benefits in 2042.” And in a Q & A piece, the paper made the same claim: Answering the question, […]

Jan 27 2005

Private Vs. Personal

Media's Social Security Semantics

[Read the Times’s response to this Action Alert.] Facing significant opposition to its plan to privatize part of the Social Security program, the White House is pushing reporters and lawmakers to use the expression “personal accounts,” since polling data seems to indicate that “privatization” is an unpopular term with voters. While it’s not unusual for politicians to try to spin the terminology used in debate, journalists should avoid changing word usage simply because some politicians think it will be to their advantage. There’s little doubt that “privatization” is a more accurate description of the White House plan, especially considering that […]