Actually, NYT, Hurting Growth Is the Whole Point of Raising Interest Rates
The New York Times said the Fed “express[ed] confidence that raising borrowing costs now won’t hurt growth”–though that is exactly why it is raising rates.
FAIR is the national progressive media watchdog group, challenging corporate media bias, spin and misinformation.
Economist Dean Baker is a senior economist at the Center for Economic and Policy Research in Washington, DC.


The New York Times said the Fed “express[ed] confidence that raising borrowing costs now won’t hurt growth”–though that is exactly why it is raising rates.


The New York Times says it would defy “economic logic” for Italy to leave the euro–under which Italy has yet to recover from the crisis of 2008.


Why exactly should those of us who don’t own lots of stock in Microsoft and Pfizer care if China doesn’t pay them licensing fees and royalties?


Many folks in the media seem to think it is part of their job to promote trade agreements like the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP)—not only in opinion pages, but in the news section, too.


Will interest payments take up the entire federal budget? A Wall Street Journal column by Greg Ip (3/28/18) gave us another rendition of this old scare story. The argument is that the interest paid on US government debt will soon impose an enormous burden on the federal government, choking off spending on important government programs. […]


The Fed could raise rates even in the absence of higher inflation. In that case, the Fed as a matter of policy would be increasing our interest burden.


The Washington Post calling for “reform” of Social Security and Medicare is a bit like the morning coffee, although somewhat less pleasant.


The question is not whether we are better off today than we were 60 years ago. It would be incredible if we were not better off. The question is by how much.


We hear people asserting that the massive inequality we are now seeing in the United States is the result of an unfettered market. This is a convenient view for those who are on the upside of things, but it also happens to be nonsense.


If we think that Trump is responsible for the rise in world oil prices, then he can reasonably be given credit for the uptick in investment that has occurred during his administration; otherwise, there is not much for him to boast about.


Republicans are putting in place a tax plan similar to what they campaigned on. If the fact that it mostly helps the rich is a surprise to anyone, it is due to the poor quality of reporting during the campaign.


The “boom” following Reagan’s tax cuts was similar to the growth during the Ford/Carter years–which are not generally remembered as a time of great prosperity.


“Lowering taxes is, at heart, what makes a Republican a Republican,” the New York Times told us. The problem with this assertion is that the Republican plans actually raise taxes for close to half of middle-income families.


There is no evidence that debt is limiting our ability to spend more in these and other areas. There is a strong case that fears over the debt, raised by folks like Fareed Zakaria, are limiting our ability to invest for the future.


New York Times columnist Bret Stephens apparently knows literally nothing about the economy, and is so ignorant he doesn’t even know how little he knows.


Since economics won’t sell the TPP, the alternative is to make it a geopolitical pact, with the main target being China. The main problem with seeing the TPP as a pact designed as a weapon against China, though, is that it doesn’t seem to have been designed that way.


People can have reasonable differences of opinion on trade deals like the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), but why is it that the proponents have to insist, with zero evidence, that not doing the deal was an economic disaster?


The New York Times is again spreading the absurd myth that House Speaker Paul Ryan and other Republicans want a free market in healthcare.


Thomas Friedman, who is legendary for his boldly stated wrong assertions, is making absurd claims about the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and the great loss the US suffers from its going down.


At a time when an ever larger share of national income is going to the richest one percent, and large segments of the working class population are seeing rising mortality rates, the Washington Post naturally turns to the country’s most pressing problem: the number of people receiving disability payments from the government.

FAIR is the national progressive media watchdog group, challenging corporate media bias, spin and misinformation. We work to invigorate the First Amendment by advocating for greater diversity in the press and by scrutinizing media practices that marginalize public interest, minority and dissenting viewpoints. We expose neglected news stories and defend working journalists when they are muzzled. As a progressive group, we believe that structural reform is ultimately needed to break up the dominant media conglomerates, establish independent public broadcasting and promote strong non-profit sources of information.
Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting
124 W. 30th Street, Suite 201
New York, NY 10001
Tel: 212-633-6700
We rely on your support to keep running. Please consider donating.