The Grayzone’s Ben Norton (5/4/20) once observed that there is
no other country on Earth lied about more than North Korea. Western corporate media outlets have absolutely zero editorial standards when reporting on the country.
FAIR (7/6/17, 6/10/19, 4/29/20) has repeatedly pointed out how coverage of North Korea epitomizes the way corporate media’s editorial standards drop as official US hostility towards a country rises—what Adam Johnson dubbed the North Korea Law of Journalism. Not only does Western media coverage of North Korea traffic in obvious falsehoods and unverifiable claims, it’s also exceptionally vindictive, to the point of sadism.
CNN’s headline “North Korea Might Be Making Millions—and Breaking Sanctions—Selling Sand. Yes, Sand” (6/9/20) is clearly intended to get its audience to laugh at North Korea, mocking it for exporting a commodity Westerners take for granted. The missing context is that this is a country that has been intentionally impoverished by a decades-long siege by the most powerful country on Earth, which has never forgiven Pyongyang for refusing to submit to the US’s brutal domination of the Korean peninsula after World War II.
CNN’s report, written by Joshua Berlinger, was based on findings that North Korea has been involved in a “massive operation allegedly worth millions of dollars involving 279 ships which appeared to be skirting international sanctions.” The findings were from the Washington-based Center for Advanced Defense Studies, described as “a nonprofit that analyzes and investigates security issues using big data.” It was observing North Korea, the story said, because
Pyongyang has been accused of selling coal and other valuable goods, sometimes in very big quantities, on the high seas to get around the prying eyes of customs officers, who must enforce United Nations sanctions on North Korea.
For CNN, the punchline of this cruel joke is that these North Korean ships were being used to “dredge and transport sand.”
Sand ‘may seem innocuous’
CNN (6/9/20) presents evidence that North Korea continues to engage in economic activity despite the West’s best efforts to starve the country.
CNN’s report stressed that although “Pyongyang has seemingly cashed in on the sand trade for years,” and that exporting sand “may seem innocuous,” it’s a crime for North Korea to do so because it is “barred from exporting earth and stone under United Nations sanctions passed in December 2017.” For CNN, the mere possibility of North Korea’s economy and its people becoming slightly more prosperous by selling sand is unacceptable: “It’s up to individual countries to uphold UN sanctions,” the network exhorted, because “the international body doesn’t have an enforcement arm.” CNN presented North Korea’s sand trade as an effective get-rich-quick scheme, noting that a UN investigation found North Korea to have “raked in at least $22 million last year.”
On a national scale, $22 million is a trifle—0.1% of North Korea’s GDP of $18 billion. If we compare that paltry sum to South Korea’s GDP of $1.69 trillion or the US’s $21.2 trillion, then it becomes clear how vindictive and cruel it is to advocate relentless enforcement of UN sanctions on exporting sand (a key ingredient in concrete, glass and processors), which is not nearly as objectionable as selling weapons to countries committing war crimes. In 2019, the US exported $531 million in sand as the world’s top sand exporter, yet that is not worthy of ridicule to CNN.
Felix Abt, a Swiss entrepreneur who served as a pointperson for investments in North Korea for seven years, and headed Pyongsu, North Korea’s first foreign-invested pharmaceutical company, wrote a memoir that described repeatedly witnessing the effects of draconian US and UN sanctions on North Korea. They prevented the country, Abt wrote, from doing necessary things like rebuilding water supply and drainage systems, hindering imports of mechanical parts and fuel to operate agricultural machinery, and causing electrical shortages that are “the largest bottleneck to any industrial development of North Korea.” He also noted that less than 20% of North Korea’s land is arable—which makes it heavily dependent on food imports, like his native Switzerland—yet illegal unilateral US sanctions compounded the damage caused by droughts, floods and the collapse of major trading partners like the USSR, causing between 500,000-600,000 deaths by starvation in North Korea during the 1990s (Al-Jazeera, 3/27/14). CNN calling for stricter enforcement in light of what have historically been genocidal sanctions—which are still causing harm to the North Korean people—is especially callous.
Yet CNN doesn’t seem to think it worthwhile to question the justice and legality of UN sanctions on North Korea; the report makes it seem as if only North Korea considers UN sanctions to be “hostile acts,” or “questions their legitimacy.”
Rogue state
Despite frequent US accusations, echoed by corporate media, of North Korea being a “rogue state” threatening the US and its allies like South Korea and Japan with nuclear weapons, the truth is the reverse: North Korea has generally been adhering to international law, while the US and the UN Security Council have been the ones acting outside their legal prerogative by arbitrarily sanctioning North Korea for acquiring nuclear weapons.
In violation of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) forbidding nuclear weapons states from using the “threat or use of force” against other nations “in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations,” the US has ceaselessly threatened North Korea with destruction by nuclear or conventional arms, from the Korean War to recent years (FAIR.org, 9/27/17). The NPT allows a member country to withdraw if “it decides that extraordinary events” have “jeopardized the supreme interests of its country.” Although North Korea initially joined the NPT in 1985 as a way to protect itself from US aggression, a North Korean diplomat explained that the country withdrew from the NPT in 2003 following the US’s illegal invasion of Iraq, which occurred after the US placed North Korea and Iraq on a hit list of “Axis of Evil” countries to be eliminated.
North Korean diplomat Ri Yong Ho explained that the UN Security Council lacks the authority to punish North Korea for beginning to test nuclear weapons in 2006, nor are there any international treaties forbidding the testing of ballistic missiles, because every single permanent member of the UN Security Council would also be in violation of it. North Korea was not bound by the NPT’s terms when it began testing, and therefore cannot be guilty of violating it.
Political analyst Stephen Gowans pointed out in Patriots, Traitors and Empires that if the UN Security Council actually possessed the authority to forbid North Korea from acquiring nuclear weapons, there would be no need for the NPT, as the Security Council could simply issue edicts forbidding any other state, aside from its permanent members, from acquiring them.
The Security Council cannot compel countries to abide by the terms of treaties they refuse to be a part of. This is why India, Israel and Pakistan are not being punished for having nuclear weapons, despite not being part of the NPT. This might also be why Ri noted that the UN Secretariat had been ignoring North Korea’s requests to organize a forum of international law experts to assess the legality of Security Council resolutions against them, when he gave his remarks criticizing the hypocrisy of singling North Korea out for sanctions on missile tests other countries are free to conduct.
Spoiling reconciliation
CNN (6/16/20) sees North Korea’s destruction of an empty building as a “turning point” in relations between North and South—rather, than, say, South Korea’s resumption of military exercises with the United States that are designed to simulate an attack against the North.
However, reports like CNN’s “North Korea Blows Up Liaison Office in Kaesong Used for Talks With South” (6/16/20) continue to reverse reality by portraying North Korea, rather than the US (FAIR.org, 2/14/18, 3/15/18), as the aggressor spoiling all efforts at reconciliation between the Koreas. CNN’s choice of headline is problematic, giving no hint that North Korea was responding to aggression from South Korea and the US, rather than acting spontaneously with no rationale.
The article did note that North Korea “framed its decision” to blow up an empty building within its borders as “a retaliatory measure after a group of defectors used balloons to send anti–North Korean leaflets north of the DMZ.” But CNN omitted the fact that US conservative groups are paying these defectors to launch these balloons, against the wishes of locals residing near the DMZ (Hankyoreh, 6/15/20, 6/16/20).
CNN also reported that “the destruction of a building meant to facilitate dialogue” is “highly symbolic,” and “may mark a turning point in relations between two countries that had committed themselves to ‘a new era of peace’ fewer than three years ago.” Why does CNN consider this action to be a “turning point” in relations between the Koreas, rather than previous actions by South Korea and the US? How come CNN frames North Korea’s demolition of an empty building as an attempt to “manufacture a crisis,” rather than a nonlethal way to highlight the genuine crisis caused by punitive sanctions?
Not to mention the annual joint war games by the US and South Korea which simulate an invasion and occupation of the North, including assassination of the country’s leadership as well as nuking the North? Last year, North Korea ended its self-imposed moratorium on ballistic missile tests after the US and South Korea conducted their Dong Maeng invasion simulations (FAIR.org, 9/20/19).
These are all longstanding attempts to stunt North Korea’s economic growth and engineer its collapse by pressuring North Korea to divert money from social spending into military spending. They also violate the agreement the South’s Moon Jae-in and the North’s Kim Jong-un made in 2018 to cease “all hostile acts and eliminating their means,” yet only the distribution of propaganda leaflets is presented as a possible violation. One possibility is that CNN considers ceaselessly threatening the North’s destruction and harming North Korean livelihoods with collective economic punishment a desirable status quo, rather than a “crisis” to be solved.
Bastion of freedom
Outlawing a political party and expelling its representatives from parliament (New York Times, 12/19/14) is odd behavior for a country described by CNN (6/16/20) as a “liberal democracy which prizes freedom of speech.”
When CNN isn’t busy reversing reality by presenting North Korea, a country whose entire military budget is less than the NYPD’s, and less than a tenth of South Korea’s, as a serious “threat,” it also falsely presents South Korea as a bastion of freedom.
CNN points out that it’s “illegal for average North Koreans to consume information that is not approved by the country’s powerful propaganda machine,” which can result in “dire consequences,” and contrasts South Korea as a “liberal democracy which prizes freedom of speech.” In reality, South Korea has a totalitarian law, the National Security Act, which authorizes the monitoring and censoring of information that is deemed to be “pro-North,” which can result in deportation, imprisonment and torture, and was used to execute political prisoners back when South Korea was a fascist military dictatorship supported by the US.
In 2014, the National Security Act was invoked to dissolve the United Progressive Party and imprison its leaders for being too “pro-North,” and for its left-wing politics (New York Times, 12/19/14). It’s unclear how fair it is to describe South Korea as a “liberal democracy” when it can outlaw political parties and criminalize political beliefs.
Western propaganda on North Korea ingeniously reverses cause and effect, and effectively blames the North for the consequences of the US and the South’s aggression. When an international siege campaign impoverishes the North and causes mass starvation, US propagandists sadistically mock the North for selling sand, calling it a “rogue state” that “starves its own people.” When North Korea acquires nuclear weapons, legally according to international law, in response to illegal threats from countries with overwhelming military superiority, outlets like CNN portray North Korea as the lawless and dangerous aggressor.
you mean North Korea never invaded South Korea? Wow! Good to know you have your history down. I had no idea that NK was forced by the dastardly imperialists to take extreme measures. Good to know.
The entire concept of the North “invading” the South makes no sense because you cannot “invade” your own country. The North and the South had been involved in a civil war long before 1950, with the South leading most of the violent skirmishes near the 38th parallel. South Korea originally began as an artificial entity imposed by the US against the wishes of the Korean people, when the US dissolved the indigenous-led People’s Republic of Korea in favor of stacking the South Korean leadership with traitorous collaborators who had aided the Japanese colonizers in exploiting and abusing their fellow Koreans. https://gowans.blog/2007/03/03/understanding-north-korea/
This is correct. I was taught Korean history while at the Defense Language Institute as a member of the US Air Force. And, in any case, how N. Korea came to be is no secret:
The United States split Korea in two, as part of a compromise over control of the Korean peninsula with The Soviet Union after WWII. It was split up, in brief, in a land grab… by the US.
A fact few Americans know but ALL who want to talk about N. Korea SHOULD KNOW is that the US engaged in massive bombing of North Korean cities, more tonnage of destruction in N. Korea than in ALL of the European theater of war in WWII, resulting in as many as 10 million Korean deaths, ruining the country’s economy, setting the country’s development back by many decades, AND setting up the circumstance in which a family dynasty now rules N. Korea through a string of dictators. The United States caused all that.
“North” Koreans have since been dependent upon trade with China and grateful to China for having interceded to help N. Koreans to push back the US invasion.
Howard shows us how effective a lifetime of brainwashing by the ruling oligarchy can be. When the oligarchy orders the tv-watching masses to hate, they mindlessly obey.
Historically, the invasion of South Korea by the North was very comparable to the American Civil War. The Confederacy chose to secede, a right guaranteed in the Declaration of Independence. The North fought a terrible war in which over 750,000 were killed and immense destruction caused, to prevent the Confederacy from exercising its legal and moral right.
In contrast, North Korea was merely trying to reunify its nation which had recently been torn apart by the Americans. The Chinese deserve the greatest credit for helping them in their hour of need.
Many people who are terrified of or confused by North Korea’s refusal to give up thier nukes do not know that according to the US SAC general during the Korean war said that a fifth of the population was killed.
What’s the problem? If government and media are to continue denouncing
the DPRK as a rogue state that deliberately starves its own people,
it only makes sense to oppose economic activity that enables
North Korea to import food and raise living standards.
Same situation in Venezuela, Iran, Cuba, etc. Because these governments
are solely responsible for their people’s impoverishment, Uncle Sam
and compliant allies have no choice but to tighten the sanctions screws
— especially during a pandemic that strains government resources.
It’s the empire’s kind and gentle humanitarianism at work.
Thanks for this, the B.S. generated by the US corporate/state media is endless, Mike Liston
CNN points out that it’s “illegal for average North Koreans to consume information that is not approved by the country’s powerful propaganda machine,” which can result in “dire consequences,” Like the dire consequences that the bastion of democracy is imposing on Julian Assange.
Good article/analysis. This POV makes a LOT more sense than the MSM’s ceaseless propaganda here in the US that virtually always portrays US actions as well-intentioned but inexplicably prone to ‘mistakes’ that happen over and over and over etc, etc….
Thank you for taking the time to write this up. This is really enlightening.
And this article does not even mention the acts of the USA during the “Korean War”. That war was directly caused by Washington’s arbitrary and high-handed decision to cut Korea in two after WW2. Throughout history Korea had been one country; but the US rulers feared (rightly) that the Communist Party would win the upcoming democratic elections, and responded by cutting the country in half so that they could at least keep control of the South. (They did exactly the same in Vietnam later).
During the Korean War the USA killed millions of Koreans and boasted of having destroyed every single building in the North. It even used biological weapons, and General MacArthur wanted to use nuclear bombs against North Korea and China.
Astonishing, isn’t it, that North Koreans don’t love the USA.
Before the US got into WWII, Japan had already invaded & occupied Korea. It was a brutal occupation. Japan found Koreans that were willing to collaborate with them & set up a puppet government run by the Korean collaborators, just like the Nazis did after they defeated France in WWII & set up the Vichy government run by French collaborators. When the US entered WWII there was a Korean resistance movement that helped us throw the Japanese out of Korea. We were the heroes of the Korean resistance movement. When the war ended they wanted to have a democracy just like ours, but the US government decided that it would be better for US economic interests to keep the Korean collaborators in power that had worked for the Japanese. We betrayed the very people that had helped us win WWII in Korea, which led to the Korean War, a war by the US against the Korean resistance movement.
Around the time the Korean War started, Dr. George Kennan was considered the leading architect of our post WWII foreign policy. He sat in a back office of the State Department & wrote about what our policies should be. Here is a quote from page 524 of a declassified top secret document he wrote titled, “Policy Planning Study 23”, i.e. PPS/23, from the US Government website of the State Department:
https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1948v01p2/d4
“Furthermore, we have about 50% of the world’s wealth but only 6.3% of its population. This disparity is particularly great as between ourselves and the peoples of Asia. In this situation, we cannot fail to be the object of envy and resentment. Our real task in the coming period is to devise a pattern of relationships which will permit us to maintain this position of disparity without positive detriment to our national security. To do so, we will have to dispense with all sentimentality and day-dreaming; and our attention will have to be concentrated everywhere on our immediate national objectives. We need not deceive ourselves that we can afford today the luxury of altruism and world-benefaction…
Page 525: In the face of this situation we would be better off to dispense now with a number of the concepts which have underlined our thinking with regard to the Far East. We should dispense with the aspiration to ‘be liked’ or to be regarded as the repository of a high-minded international altruism. We should stop putting ourselves in the position, of being our brothers’ keeper and refrain from offering moral and ideological advice. We should cease to talk about vague and—for the Far East—unreal objectives such as human rights, the raising of the living standards, and democratization. The day is not far off when we are going to have to deal in straight power concepts. The less we are then hampered by idealistic slogans, the better.”
One thing that Kennan had wrong was his statement, “The less we are then hampered by idealistic slogans, the better.” Our government still uses idealistic slogans about promoting freedom & democracy, & the use of such slogans doesn’t hamper us at all in committing mass murder.
The US war against North Korea killed about 30% of the population of North Korea. Of the total that was killed, about 20% of the population was killed by bombings. Here is a quote from the “Washington Post”, “Opinions”,
“The U.S. war crime North Korea won’t forget”. 3/24/15”
“The bombing was long, leisurely and merciless, even by the assessment of America’s own leaders. ‘Over a period of three years or so, we killed off — what — 20 percent of the population,’ Air Force Gen. Curtis LeMay, head of the Strategic Air Command during the Korean War, told the Office of Air Force History in 1984. Dean Rusk, a supporter of the war and later US secretary of state, said the United States bombed ‘everything that moved in North Korea, every brick standing on top of another.’ After running low on urban targets, U.S. bombers destroyed hydroelectric and irrigation dams in the later stages of the war, flooding farmland and destroying crops.” By the end of the war no building over one story tall was left standing in North Korea.
If some other country did this to the US, i.e. killed 30% of the US population today, that would mean killing about 98 million people. What would we think of a country that killed 98,000,000 Americans & destroyed all of our electric power & water treatment plants? It is easy to find out what the US did in Korea, yet the US government has easily been able to vilify & make fun of North Korea for over 60 yrs, & Americans seldom make any attempt to check the facts about what we did there. The same is true of Iran & Cuba. What North Korea, Iran, & Cuba have in common is that they are all former US economic slave states that have managed to break away & become independent; that isn’t allowed.
Here is an article with a video about N. Korea by war correspondent, Andre Vltcek:
https://www.globalresearch.ca/video-the-faces-of-north-korea/5648922
Josh, you are Based and Juche pilled.
You clearly have no idea what you’re talking about, and thus appear foolish.
You have an excellent opportunity to improve yourself by simply reading the responses to your post here. I heartily recommend that you do so.
American troops arrived in Korea in 1945 and never left. South Korea eventually prospered and became a major economic and military power, but American Generals plan to occupy Korea forever. They exaggerate the North Korean threat, ignoring that South Korea has twice its population, 53 times its economic power measured by GDP, and a modern military that is roughly five times stronger than the decrepit North Korean Army. American occupation troops should have left four decades ago, but President Jimmy Carter’s effort to withdraw was thwarted by Generals. The US military remains to deter peace and block unification in order to retain South Korea as a vassal state.
Here is a short video about these facts:
The independents (Russia, Iran, China) should do more for their North Korean friend.
It can do okay with their support. It did okay when the USSR helped out. Why not now?
>>> North Korea has generally been adhering to international law, while the US and the UN Security Council have been the ones acting outside their legal prerogative by arbitrarily sanctioning North Korea for acquiring nuclear weapons <<<
Show us where that evidence is.
Clarification: >>> North Korea has generally been adhering to international law <<<
That's the particular item I was hoping the writer would address.