CNN‘s Jake Tapper took a baseless accusation made on X and elevated it to a national story, smearing Palestinian-American Rep. Rashida Tlaib as antisemitic.
Rep. Rashida Tlaib (Detroit Metro Times, 9/13/24) described the indicted protesters as “people that just want to save lives, no matter their faith or ethnicity.”
In an interview with the Detroit Metro Times (9/13/24), Tlaib accused Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel of “biases” in her prosecution of pro-Palestinian protesters and not other protesters:
“We’ve had the right to dissent, the right to protest,” Tlaib says. “We’ve done it for climate, the immigrant rights movement, for Black lives, and even around issues of injustice among water shutoffs. But it seems that the attorney general decided if the issue was Palestine, she was going to treat it differently, and that alone speaks volumes about possible biases within the agency she runs.”
Tlaib went on to blame the influence of academic officials for the prosecutions: “I think people at the University of Michigan put pressure on her to do this, and she fell for it.”
It’s a pretty straightforward charge that drew no particular notice for many days. A week later, Nessel—who is Jewish—posted on X (9/20/24): “Rashida should not use my religion to imply I cannot perform my job fairly as attorney general. It’s antisemitic and wrong.”
‘Quite an accusation’
Referring to Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel’s prosecution of pro-Palestine protesters, Jake Tapper (CNN, 9/22/24) asserted that “Congresswoman Tlaib is suggesting that…she’s only doing it because she’s Jewish and the protesters are not.”
Nessel’s accusation is clearly groundless, as anyone reading Tlaib’s actual quote can see. But CNN‘s Jake Tapper (9/22/24), interviewing Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, presented the false accusation as fact, and used that newly invented fact to try to force Whitmer to condemn Tlaib for something she didn’t do.
Tapper quoted only one sentence from the Metro Times report—the one beginning “it seems the attorney general decided…”—followed by Nessel’s accusation. Tapper then asked Whitmer: “Do you think that Tlaib’s suggestion that Nessel’s office is biased was antisemitic?”
When Whitmer tried to avoid the bait, Tapper pressed on:
Congresswoman Tlaib is suggesting that she shouldn’t be prosecuting these individuals that Nessel says broke the law, and that she’s only doing it because she’s Jewish and the protesters are not. That’s quite an accusation. Do you think it’s true?
Contrary to Tapper’s assumption, some of the protesters charged by Nessel are, in fact, Jewish (CAIR, 9/23/24).
Tapper’s remarkable misrepresentation had ripple effects in corporate media, as other journalists (and their editors) repeated the smear without bothering to do any factchecking. Jewish Insider‘s Josh Kraushaar (9/22/24) reported on Tapper’s interview and mischaracterized Tlaib’s Metro Times interview as having “claimed that Nessel is only charging the protesters because she’s Jewish.” (The article later changed the word “claimed” to “suggested,” as if that were more accurate.)
CNN‘s Dana Bash (9/23/24) brought Tapper’s interview up on air the next day, comparing Whitmer’s response to Sen. Tom Cotton refusing to condemn Donald Trump’s declaration that if he loses, “it’s the fault of the Jews.” CNN political director David Chalian responded, perpetuating the smear as fact: “It’s not very hard to say that Rashida Tlaib saying that Dana Nessel is pursuing charges because she’s Jewish is an antisemitic thing to say.”
‘Never explicitly said’
USA Today‘s Ingrid Jacques (9/24/24) charged Tlaib with antisemtism even after Metro Times (9/23/24) confirmed that Tlaib never referred to Nessel’s ethnicity.
The Metro Times published a factcheck (9/23/24) the day after Tapper’s interview, calling the characterization “spurious,” and clarified that “Tlaib never once mentioned Nessel’s religion or Judaism.” It noted that “Metro Times pointed out in the story that Nessel is Jewish, and that appears to be the spark that led to the false claims.”
But even after that piece should have put the issue to rest, USA Today published a column by Ingrid Jacques (9/24/24) that repeated the falsehood in its very headline: “Tlaib Makes Antisemitic Comments Again.”
Tapper’s initial segment warranted an on-air correction and apology. Instead, he doubled down, bringing on to discuss the matter the next day (9/23/24) the very person who initially smeared Tlaib. Only after giving Nessel a platform to repeat her baseless charge—”Clearly, she’s referencing my religion as to why she thinks I can’t be fair,” Nessel said—did Tapper tell viewers that he “misspoke” in the previous day’s segment, explaining, “I was trying to characterize [Nessel’s] views of Tlaib’s comments.”
He then asked Nessel:
What do you make of those today, noting that Congresswoman Tlaib never explicitly said that your bias was because of your religion, and so it’s unfair for you to make that allegation?
“Explicitly”? Tlaib never said it, period, which is what any responsible journalist would point out.
ACTION ALERT: Messages to CNN can be sent here. Please remember that respectful communication is the most effective. Feel free to leave a copy of your message in the comments thread of this post.
You can also sign a petition calling on CNN to retract its false report.
Tapper knew what he was doing, and I think this is what happens to language when power is under threat. Dogmatic overreactions to everyday protests have become the norm, and this is a picture of American global power receding. Social media is being treated like an enemy weapon.
Comment I posted on CNN’s feedback page:
“””
I demand that you fire Jake Tapper immediately!
I read somewhere that he criticized Rep. Tlaib because of her Palestinian heritage and Muslim faith, and urged voters to remove people like her from Congress. What an ugly, bigoted thing to say on air!
Well, maybe those weren’t Tapper’s exact words. Maybe he wasn’t actually referring to her race. Maybe he actually meant to criticize her for her actions. Nonetheless, the underlying sentiment — that only white people should be allowed to represent Americans in Congress — is so odious that it can’t be tolerated in our trusted journalists!
See what I did there?
In case my satire isn’t obvious, let me clarify. I, Harry Chomsky, do not think CNN should fire Tapper. Instead, CNN should issue a prominent correction to Tapper’s repeated lies about Rep. Tlaib. CNN should use its public megaphone to contradict the lies as they spread virus-like through the news ecosystem. Further, CNN should follow up on this scandal with a sincere investigation into the widespread anti-Palestinian bias in US institutions, and with features on Rep. Tlaib’s ongoing work for social justice. And CNN should encourage Tapper to offer a public apology for the harm his lies have caused to Rep. Tlaib and to her work.
The nature of Tapper’s apology will speak volumes about what kind of journalist he really is.
“””
Wow. You seem so impressed with yourself as your tirade of words speak volumes, as you put it. Take a deep breath now – hold it – and breath out. Rinse and repeat as the sun will come out tomorrow.
Wow. Criticizing someone for keeping abreast of issues, and attempting to make things better – and right – by seeking to make his voice heard. Or at least voicing his opinion in our pseudo-democracy. The US in its late capitalist phase seems to be utilizing a page from Izvestia. But what am I saying? US corporate media – CNN, NBC, CBS, ABC, PBS, Jake Tapper, ad nauseam – are State media.
OK. Roll your joint, spliff, bone or whatever and smoke it down to the end (its now a roach). Alternately others use a glass pipe or a water pipe called a bong and smoke it that way. Either way, take a deep breath now – hold it – and breath out. Rinse and repeat as your sun too will come out tomorrow.
Me think Komrade Kamala likes her Marxist central planning.
Government agencies do what you call central planning. So does the Federal Reserve and of course the military. Are they Marxist? So what type of central planning are you talking about that Kamala wants to do?
What Tapper did was reprehensible “yellow journalism”; the willful promotion of a false and misleading narrative.