![American Bridge ad: Everyone Knows [China] Lied About the Virus](https://eadn-wc04-3257648.nxedge.io/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/American-Bridge-Everyone-Knew-They-Lied-1-1024x512.png)
As Covid-19 and its economic effects clearly dominate all else politically, ads for the Trump campaign are ramping up the anti-China rhetoric in an effort to deflect blame. The first attack ad Donald Trump launched since Joe Biden became the presumptive Democratic nominee was titled “Biden Stands Up for China” (4/9/20), while a pro-Trump super PAC is airing multiple ads (4/16/20, 4/16/20) painting Biden as cozy with China. One ad warned China is “killing our jobs, stealing technology and putting us in danger with Covid-19”; the other concluded, “Now more than ever, America must stop China. And to stop China, you have to stop Joe Biden.”
Rather than respond by focusing blame for the crisis squarely where it belongs—on Trump’s incompetent, reckless and self-centered management—and working to beat back the dangerously rising anti-Asian sentiment in this country, Biden and some of his supporting super PACs are choosing to adopt rather than challenge the anti-China premise of the attacks.
Joe Biden’s campaign ran an ad (4/18/20) attacking Donald Trump for saying positive things about the Chinese government.
The pro-Biden super PAC American Bridge released an ad (4/17/20) that announced in a menacing voiceover: “[Trump] gave China more than praise. He shipped China 17 tons of American masks and medical supplies. Our masks and supplies. Supplies we need now.”
The Biden campaign put out its own ad (4/18/20) accusing Trump of being the one who’s too cozy with China, saying he “rolled over for the Chinese” and “didn’t hold China accountable” for its own management of the pandemic.
As the Nation‘s Jeet Heer (4/20/20) pointed out, using the phrase “the Chinese” here is particularly problematic, as it conflates China’s government with Chinese people—many of whom live in the United States. And the obsession (shared by much of the media) with “holding China accountable”—i.e., making China a scapegoat—continues to prioritize aggressive us-vs.-them international posturing over international cooperation and looking for lessons from China’s ultimately successful drive to control the virus’s spread inside its country (FAIR.org, 3/24/20).
The New York Times (4/10/20) is able to identify Trump’s attempt to tie Biden to anti-Chinese messages for what it is—but not so much when the attacks go in the other direction.
The responsible way for media to cover this campaign battle would be to call out these xenophobic Yellow Peril ads for what they are. But while some journalists are able to do so for the pro-Trump ads, far fewer are questioning the pro-Biden ads. After Trump’s April 9 ad, a team of New York Times reporters (4/10/20) managed to call the ad “xenophobic”—though its decision to characterize his rhetoric as merely “exploit[ing] racial discord” rather than fomenting it reveals the paper’s continued adherence to its executive editor’s insistence that it must not directly call Trump racist (FAIR.org, 11/22/19). The Washington Post‘s John Wagner (4/10/20), noting that the ad included an image of former Washington State Gov. Gary Locke, said it “appeared to be suggesting that Locke is a Chinese official at a time when Asian Americans face rising bigotry and blame for the coronavirus outbreak.”
But when media later included the pro-Biden response ads, criticism was in short supply. While Trump’s xenophobia and racism are unparalleled in contemporary mainstream US politics, and therefore easy to identify, it’s certainly possible—and urgent—to point out xenophobia and racism from both major parties, without at the same time falling into the common media fallacy of creating a false equivalence between them.
Reporting a week later on both sides’ ads and rhetoric on China, a separate New York Times team (4/18/20) labeled the GOP strategy an attempt “to divert attention from the administration’s heavily criticized response to the coronavirus by pinning the blame on China.” But the reporters merely found it “striking” to see both Biden and Trump “attempt to portray each other as captive to Beijing.” The piece also described, without commentary, the American Bridge ad.
The Washington Post (4/19/20) features rival political operatives arguing about which candidate “bent the knee to China.”
Meanwhile, in a Post followup (4/18/20) about Trump’s efforts to link Biden to China, the team of reporters let the rival super PACs offer the only commentary on their ads. And a piece by the Post‘s Michelle Ye Hee Lee (4/19/20) on the American Bridge ad couldn’t get past bland press release-style descriptions in its more than 500 words: “Trump and his allies increasingly are seizing on China’s role in the spread of the novel coronavirus to attack Biden,” while the ad “aims to counter the Trump operation’s narrative.”
Like the New York Times, the LA Times (4/17/20) called Trump’s strategy “xenophobic,” but offered no similar analysis of the pro-Biden messaging.
ABC‘s The Note (4/20/20) appeared to buy in to the ads’ political messaging, arguing that
pinning blame on China could draw bipartisan agreement—particularly as more evidence emerges that the Chinese government knew more than it was letting on months ago.
(It’s worth reiterating that China alerted the World Health Organization about a peculiar form of pneumonia on December 31, 2019, when just 27 cases had been recognized, none of which had yet turned fatal; it was not until a week later that Chinese scientists identified the novel coronavirus as the culprit. China declared a lockdown in Hubei Province on January 23, after 18 deaths had been counted nationwide; by comparison, the first statewide stay-at-home order in the US was issued on March 19, by California, after 200 national deaths.)
On CNN (4/19/20), host Don Lemon aired a clip from Biden’s ad and commented, “The Biden campaign turning the tables on the president there, because Trump has been trying to say that Biden is the one who is too cozy with China.” Contributor Garrett Graff likewise had no critique of Biden’s ad:
Yes, and it’s hard to believe that this administration could get away with saying Joe Biden is soft on China, given the extent to which President Trump is on record praising China over the course of this entire presidency, let alone just in the last couple months during the pandemic.
MSNBC‘s Joe Scarborough (4/18/20) went so far as to rave about Biden’s ad: “This is the most devastating political ad I’ve seen in years. It reveals the truth about Trump and China, and that truth is ugly.”
Over at NBCNews.com (4/18/20), Sahil Kapur laid out the issue for readers:
The back-and-forth shows the extent to which the deadly virus, which experts say originated in the city of Wuhan, has turned China into a powerful election-year issue, with both major party candidates scrambling to get on the right side.
It’s a classic media formulation, but of course it’s not the virus that turned China into a powerful issue—it’s political leaders, aided and abetted by their media accomplices. And unfortunately, the “right side”—the one that seeks to end both the pandemic and xenophobia—is largely missing from the media at the moment.
Featured image: Pro-Biden super PAC American Bridge presents China lying about the coronavirus as something that “everyone knows.”
What, if anything, is this article saying about China and it’s US relations? That we should separate our perceptions of those on the mainland and those in the US who might have been here for generations? It’s not clear here, except to say that problems with Chinese here is about xenophobia.
The race(ists) for the presidency
Is it unfair for them to list facts? As long as they say what is true I have no problem with the adds. Also, pointing to China is not the same as pointing at Chinese. Just like many in the world do not like the US government, but do like Americans I think most people can make the distinction snf should we really care if it hurts their feelings? From what I understand in China the Chinese are openly racist and practicly hostile to forigners.
FAIR’s unwillingness to criticize the CCP has been a very disappointing thing to witness during the past few months.
I appreciate your watchful, thoughtful, informative reporting of this sort. Thanks for keeping me on my toes.
Someone (or multiple someones) on Biden’s team decided that challenging Trump over who hates China more is a SMART and winning campaign strategy.
That’s how inept these folks are.
It is also stupid. This will leave Chinese Americans as well as Asian Americans staying at home in November as we did in 2016, from NC, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin and Minnesota as well as Ohio. Asian Americans voted for democratic tickets dropped from 2014 of 76%+ to below 63% in 2016.
If Joe Biden wants to win these states, he needs NOT compete with trump who hates or cozy toward China.
Joe Biden needs to concentrate the policies set forth by AY, AK, Bernie S, and EW, which are good enough to make him the next POTUSA!
More correct would be either PRC or more specifically, the CCP, if you use any designation.
The CCP controls everything in China including, of course, virus response, research, and news media.
Biden is an empty suit, Trump is an angry suit. I can’t stand either of them.
Our Intel community and foreign policy establishment is literally getting away with murder. They know that they divert attention away from their own failures by getting both Democrats and Republicans to unite on a common enemy because it takes the heat off of them as well. They know that every political leader fantasizes to be like GWB and stand over our crushed bodies with a bull horn and call for a holy crusade to smite our enemies. That is much easier to do than to treat this like an actual healthcare issue.
America is useless
It takes an unprecedented level of delusional self-righteousness to conflate criticism of the CCP – criticism that is coming from around the globe, not just Americans – with xenophobia and racism. While it’s entirely rational to criticize both Trump and the CCP, the latter’s cover up and downplaying of the virus is a matter of public record – pointing out facts is not “scapegoating” even if leaders botched their own local response. The irrational desire for people (like the writer of this article) to conflate any anger or skepticism towards the CCP with racism is not only unfair to everyone else in the world who feels this way , it’s completely indifferent to the Chinese people living under an oppressive authoritarian regime that prioritizes it’s own propganda and image before it’s people. I’m all for holding all parties accountable, and that includes Trump and his adminstration’s botching of a local response, but this hyperpartisian desire that places “getting Trump” above everything else, at the expense of completely withholding or even exonerating criticism from oppressive governments elsewhere in the world. What the pseudo-intellectual writer of this article doesn’t seem to understand is that her brain’s addiction to hyper-partisan affirmations contributes to the popularity of Trump among the less educated more than anything else.
Maybe it’s not the Chinese virus, but the US Military Virus, as they were in Wuhan in Oct. for the military games and who knew the US and China did that? ( info from the Military Times in Oct. 2019.)
Besides, I wish people would refer to the Pandemic of 1918 and not the Spanish Flu. Spain was not involved in WW 1, so I guess the usual allies ( US UK and France had to blame someone. How dare Spain not join the war. : )
People should be more concerned with the Presidential Virus of 2020, or COprez2020 which both Trump and Biden suffer from.
FACT: There’s an ongoing, major power struggle between China and the US.
FACT: China is emboldened to assert its political will by military means, thanks to the inability of the US political system to remove her insane president.
FACT: Biowarfare is an effective method of modern war.
FACT: China failed to control the virus.
FACT: At least anecdotal evidence suggest the virus most probably came from the lab in Wuhan.
FACT: China is hacking military, commercial and political targets and intimidating academic throughout the world.
FACT: China has infiltrated and is manipulating the political system in dozens of countries, the most obvious example being New Zealand, where they have ex-military intelligence personnel influencing the politics.
Break-ins at house of NZ academic studying China’s power
“University of Canterbury professor Anne-Marie Brady’s work on Chinese political influence has had a global impact. Her 2017 report Magic Weapons presented New Zealand as a case study of China’s growing use of “soft power” tactics in areas like party politics, media and education.”
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/101593947/pm-to-follow-up-breakin-at-house-of-academic-studying-chinas-power