The New York Times had a good editorial on May 20 headlined”Gas Prices and Political Pandering.” The paper slammed Republican rhetoric about domestic production and gas prices:
[Sen. Mitch] McConnell said his bill would bring relief at the pump by raising domestic output. That is fiction. Production will take years to come online and even then would have a tiny impact on prices set on the world market.
And they also pointed out that Obama was making similar arguments:
Last weekend, he, too, was out there pitching domestic production…. None will quickly lead to new drilling or have any effect on gas prices. Yet because his remarks were framed as a response to gas prices, he helped feed the Republicans’ bogus narrative.
So who the heck is doing this bogus framing? Oh yeah–the New York Times, in its news section. John Broder wrote this lead on May 15:
President Obama, facing voter anger over high gasoline prices and complaints from Republicans and business leaders that his policies are restricting the development of domestic energy resources, announced Saturday that he was taking several steps to speed oil and gas drilling on public lands and waters.
So the editorial page is where bogus narratives are questioned, while the news section is where they’re propagated.
“So the editorial page is where bogus narratives are questioned, while the news section is where they’re propagated.”
When it comes to the Times, and the corpress in general, there’s ample parking for them on both of those streets, wouldn’t you say?
Why does anyone even read the rags called “news”papers any longer? It’s all lies, about everything. Speculators are driving up gas prices, not supply and demand.