Since the 1950s, many young Americans have first encountered critiques of mass media in the pages of Mad. With its intricate cartoons and satirical sendups, the monthly magazine gained a reputation for skewering politicians, advertisers, TV shows and a variety of print outlets.
One of Mad’s recurrent shticks has involved making fun of gaps between words and meaning — an especially welcome form of humor because mainstream news so often amplifies the words of public figures with scarcely a hint of irony, much less deprecation. Notwithstanding the zany image of Alfred E. Neuman, the magazine’s grinning icon of absurdity has overseen plenty of sobering antidotes to the phony self-importance of major media.
One-third of the way through February, looking at a few of the day’s top news stories, I tried to imagine the properly Mad way to annotate them. Here’s what I came up with:
What she actually meant: “Stop complaining! We pulled off the invasion of Iraq, our troops are staying, and there’s nothing you wimpy French people can do to stop us, so get over it already!”
What she meant: “Don’t forget how France and Germany lost out on Iraqi oil deals and other booty after the invasion. Uncle Sam has plenty of big trains leaving stations all over the world. You want to ride or eat our dust?”
What he meant: “If it wasn’t for Karl, I’d never have been a governor, let alone president. This guy is so smart and mean he makes Lee Atwater and Roger Ailes seem like dumb saints. I haven’t had this much fun since I was a kid blowing up frogs with firecrackers.”
What Bush meant: “I owe Karl big time. Thanks to him, my opportunism has triumphed with my administration’s policies. No way do I want to lose him.”
What he meant: “Republicans need a better image on racial issues. If we can make our percentage of the black vote a little less pitiful, we’ll have a better chance of keeping the Democrats out of power in Washington.”
What he meant: “Back in the ’50s and ’60s, a lot of the mentors of the right-wing politicians I’m now tight with were fighting against desegregation and vilifying the civil rights movement as a sinister force for judicial activism that threatened to undermine the sacred covenant of states’ rights. Well, times have changed. Fortunately, the old power base of the Dixiecrats in Congress has been transformed into the country’s most solid bedrock of Republican power. Blacks can use those water fountains, but we’ll keep slashing social programs and skewing the tax structures so my rich pals can get richer while lots of people will stay near the bottom of the economic ladder. And I’m not just whistling Dixie.”
