FAIR is the national progressive media watchdog group, challenging corporate media bias, spin and misinformation.
Following Israel’s assassinations of a Hezbollah commander in Beirut and a Hamas negotiator in Tehran, corporate media pundits have called for the US and Israel to escalate the region-wide war.
As the Democratic Party began to coalesce behind Kamala Harris, the New York Times quickly put forward the knee-jerk corporate media prescription for Democratic candidates: Move to the right.
In a rational world, voters would be aware that crime went down sharply during the Biden/Harris administration.
A Times guest essay recapitulates the misrepresentation, selective quotation and faulty logic that has characterized so much of the pro—lab leak side of the Covid origin discourse.
“It’s better that the ladder be raised in an orderly way by reasonable people.”
With two months to go before Venezuelan elections, Western outlets are busy crafting familiar narratives, and leading the charge is the New York Times.
From the career triumphs of nepo babies to deep dives about luxury real estate, it’s clear that the New York Times’ most cherished subject is the One Percent.
Like most New York Times articles about trans politics that FAIR has analyzed, the piece marginalized the voices of those most impacted.
Kahn is committed to denying that the Times—the most agenda-setting US news outlet—has any say over what issues are considered important.
The New York Times has a long tradition of promoting fascists while crying censorship when a leftist government defends itself against coups.
A review of six months of New York Times coverage exposes a remarkable selective interest in threats to journalism.
Readers were invited to view these critics as brave iconoclasts at odds with the radical doctrines of their former employers.
A New York Times memo seemed designed to dampen criticism of Israel’s actions in Gaza and to reinforce the Israeli narrative of the conflict.
The New York Times offered no rebuttal from any international law scholar to the US claim that the ceasefire resolution was “nonbinding.”
As Israel wages an unprecedented war on Palestinian civilians, the New York Times’ newsletter blames everyone but Israel for the carnage.
Despite efforts to include Palestinian voices, editors at two leading papers skewed the Gaza debate toward an Israel-centered perspective.
The New York Times’ post–New Hampshire analysis bodes very poorly for how coverage of the 2024 election will proceed.
Contrary to the New York Times, the evidence of local Democrats morphing into Trumpists on the border is scant to nonexistent.
The effort to distinguish between acceptable and unacceptable critics of Israel painted supporters of equal rights as antisemitic bigots.
Amidst a concocted outrage that has nothing to do with safeguarding Jewish students, the New York Times is going along for the ride.
