A New York Times article (4/23/10) by Peter Baker and David Herszenhorn remarks of Barack Obama:
With his poll numbers sagging, the choreographed confrontation seemed aimed at tapping the nation’s antiestablishment mood as well as muscling financial regulation legislation through Congress.
While Obama’s confrontation with the financial industry was no doubt choreographed, are his poll numbers really sagging?
This chart from Pollster.com, averaging out all the major national polls, reveals instead that opinion on Obama’s job performance is remarkably steady (and remarkably evenly divided, too).
It’s hard to turn a line like that into exciting news, which isn’t to say that the people who write press releases for polling firms can’t try. The Monkey Cage blog (4/21/10; via Yglesias, 4/21/10) noted a release from Quinnipiac that began:
President Barack Obama’s job approval, which bounced slightly to a 45-46 percent split March 25 in the wake of his healthcare victory, has flattened out at 44-46 percent, his lowest approval rating since his inauguration, according to a Quinnipiac University national poll released today.
The approval ratings since the beginning of this year on which Quinnipiac based this exciting tale: 45, 45, 46, 45, 44. The margin of error of these polls: +/- 2.2 percentage points.
FAIR, I’m generally with you (and I’m an Obama supporter, warts and all), but in this case it looks like you’re distorting the picture. As I read the article and the graph, the President’s approval rating *since his inauguration* has in fact dropped by about 20 points, and this is what the quote you present says. But you’re saying that *since January 2010* his numbers have been flat. That’s two different statements.
Is there some reason the data from 2009 should be discounted in this story? Have I missed something?
Newspapers are generally in the business of explaining what happened yesterday; for a daily reporter, four months is practically a lifetime. Even from a broader perspective, it doesn’t make a lot of sense to point to a decline in popularity that happened last year as an explanation for a change in tactics that happened last week.
With our constitutions Obamanibly Baracken, it’s NOW either “DO or doodoo time”!
Obama is rightwing garbage. His base is shrugging and walking away, the right is incensed that a not-100%-white guy is in their White House. Perfect storm. And all by design to shift rhetoric, ideology, and policy rightward and more rightward still. Today, the debate is between Mussolini-style Democrats and Nazi-style Republicans. (Fascists believe in the unity of capital and the state, with extraordinary executive powers – like ordering the death of a US citizen, massive secrecy, etc… Nazis are fascists PLUS they add overt scapegoating racism, flag-and-uniform fetishism, and a variety of obscurantist anti-scientific wackadoodle bs.)