
ABC (1/30/22): A “new ABC/Ipsos poll shows high disapproval of Biden’s handling of a range of issues.”
Last week (FAIR.org, 2/2/22), I suggested that a new ABC News/Ipsos poll (1/30/22) was a poster child for what is wrong with many media-sponsored polls these days. Instead of a serious effort to measure what the public is thinking about any specific issue, the poll glided superficially across a whole range of subjects, never stopping long enough to provide understanding of any one of them—creating an illusion of public opinion that is either misleading, biased or simply inaccurate.
That article focused on the poll’s biased wording on one question about President Joe Biden’s promise to nominate a Black woman for the Supreme Court vacancy. In this article, I examine the nine presidential approval questions the poll included.
Origin of presidential approval
In October 1938, George Gallup asked a presidential approval question for the first time, some three years after he launched his newspaper column “America Speaks.” The intent was to measure a president’s political strength between elections.
For the past seven-plus decades, Gallup has continued to ask the general approval question: “Do you approve or disapprove of the way [president’s first and last name] is handling his job as president?” Other polling organizations these days routinely include this question, or a minor variant of it, in their own polls.
The question appears to capture the president’s and his party’s overall popularity with the public. According to Frank Newport and Lydia Saad, writing in Public Opinion Quarterly (Spring/21), the general approval question correlates moderately with how well a president does when running for re-election, and how well his party fares in midterm elections.
That’s why numerous analysts (see here, here and here) have suggested that if Biden’s low approval rating persists into the fall, the midterms this year could be disastrous for the Democrats.
While the general presidential approval rating provides some relevant insight into public opinion, the same cannot be said for presidential approval questions that focus on individual issues. The January ABC/Ipsos poll included nine such questions:
| Do you approve or disapprove of the way Joe Biden is handling: [items ordered by approval rating] | |||
| Approve (%) | Disapprove (%) | Skipped (%) | |
| Rebuilding the United States’ infrastructure | 50 | 47 | 3 |
| Response to the Coronavirus (Covid-19) | 50 | 49 | 1 |
| Climate change | 47 | 51 | 2 |
| The economic recovery | 42 | 56 | 2 |
| The situation with Russia and Ukraine | 41 | 56 | 3 |
| Immigration | 34 | 64 | 2 |
| Crime | 34 | 64 | 3 |
| Gun violence | 29 | 69 | 3 |
| Inflation | 29 | 69 | 2 |
If we take the questions and answers at face value, the results present an amazing picture of the American public. Here are nine very different, and quite complicated issues. And for each one, the respondents are asked to assess how well Biden is dealing with each issue.
The numbers indicate that 97% or more of American adults know what Biden is doing for each issue. And, presumably, after careful thought, they have come to a meaningful opinion as to whether they approve or disapprove of his actions.
This is the media-polling Myth of the American Electorate—fully informed and attentive to all issues, with well-considered views about the way they should be addressed.
That myth, of course, bears little resemblance to reality. In fact, on most issues, the vast majority of the public is simply uninformed—about the issue, and especially about what any president is doing to address the issue.*
The illusion of public opinion
Media polls get virtually all respondents to answer a question, regardless of whether they actually have an opinion, by the way in which questions are phrased. They often use a “forced-choice” format, which provides explicit answers like “approve” or “disapprove,” but fails to provide an explicit “unsure” or “don’t know” option. Respondents can volunteer a “no opinion” response, but the vast majority feel pressured to come up with one of the explicit answers, and—as the ABC/Ipsos poll reveals—that pressure works.
Since most people really don’t know much about how the president is addressing each of the issues, their forced-choice responses can be based on a variety of factors. For some respondents, the mention of Biden’s name will cause them automatically to “approve”; for others, it will cause them automatically to “disapprove.”
Some respondents will be influenced by what vague news stories they’ve recently read or heard. In that case, they’re reacting not to what the president is actually doing, but to whether they perceive the topic itself (such as the economic recovery, or the situation with Russia and the Ukraine) as good or bad.
Some issues are inherently “bad”—like crime, gun violence and inflation—and, except for the most devoted partisans, most people will “disapprove” of any president’s “handling” of those issues.
The ABC/Ipsos results thus tell us almost nothing important about public opinion on any of those issues. The news organization could have focused on one or another topic, and asked a variety of questions to probe what Americans are thinking.
Instead, we get a whole lot of soundbites, and only the illusion of public opinion.
*Besides the article referenced in this paragraph, numerous studies over the years have demonstrated that large segments of the public are unengaged on any given issue. Among the many studies that explicitly address this issue are Daniel Yankelovich, Coming to Public Judgment: Making Democracy Work in a Complex World (Syracuse University Press, 1991; George Bishop, The Illusion of Public Opinion: Fact and Artifact in American Public Opinion Polls (Rowman & Littlefield, 2004); David W. Moore, The Opinion Makers: An Insider Exposes the Truth Behind the Polls (Beacon Press, 2009); Christopher H. Achen & Larry Bartels, Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government (Princeton University Press, 2017).
ACTION ALERT: You can send messages to ABC News here (or via Twitter: @ABC). Please remember that respectful communication is the most effective. Feel free to leave a copy of your message in the comments thread.
FEATURED IMAGE: Detail from ABC image (1/30/22) of a Biden press event.




The purpose of the polls is to try to gauge how people will vote. If the polling sample were to be more thoroughly informed, they would no longer be an accurate representation of the uninformed voting populace. They would help predict what the results of our elections would be in a fantasy world where every voter was well educated on the issues, but would no longer be very good at predicting the results of our actual elections.
A pollster going door to door, asked average Americans which of these two things was the biggest problem facing our the country: ignorance or apathy.
The number one response received was: “I don’t know, and I don’t care!”
I bet that’s true, which ain’t funny!
“Don’t know” &
“Don’t care”. would be current answers most heard about everything.
Who can blame ’em?
News networks are either of the
( #1) FauxSpews type ~ propaganda & disinformation only. NOT fact-based NEWS….OR…
(#2) The “legit news” — other networks & local broadcast network news.
Best I can say about them is they actually report the news of day – brief headline versions only. Mostly, must buy & read news all day, every day & after 11mos of that all day, am sick of it! I may join the “don’t know, don’t care” group!
But, on superficial level…LMAO!
GREAT article!!! America is getting seriously manipulated by dishonest polling.
Hmmm. Let’s see:
Here are some fun questions :
1) Are there too many white men in positions of power?
2 )Do we need some kind of ACTUAL qualifications before a person can run for Congress?
3) If police had to live in their work district and had to walk beats and interact with the public daily—would people be more willing to call the police for aid?
4) Should America have HEALTH CARE FOR ALL, as so many European nations have?
5) If an elected official is censured–should they also lose their pay during that time ?
6) In past years in America, Generals used to put their ass on the line—if we returned to this format , do you think Generals would be more thoughtful about going to war?
7) What if everyone in America paid the same 10% tax rate. NO write offs. Would that bring in more taxes and more fair taxes?
8) WHAT IF— the People got to vote on going to war, and not just Congress? Would America be a better nation?
9)What if pay levels were reviewed every year? Would the minimum wage be more
honest if all Americans voted on what it should be?
10) What if both the House and the Senate were elected every 4 years? This would allow more time for House members as they would not need to work so often on fundraising every 2 years, and we would more easily see the dead wood of 6 years in the Senate.
What if government policies actually reflected the majority opinion of voters?
https://wastedink.substack.com/p/psychopathology-of-a-failed-state
I like your questions so much better!! I think just reading them would give many of Trump’s cult a bangin’ headache!
And since he can’t answer the questions & tell them what to think, say — guess they can’t answer either.
Candidate…
Voters…
None of ’em should be allowed out of house except on a leash…just around the block, since can only turn more to the right.
Thank you for this report. Earlier today, in response to a survey at a news site, I had asked that they cover this very topic. What a happy surprise to see your report.
How about “I need to know more” option? If a lot of respondents checked that the media might reflect on itself, but I kinda doubt it.
I feel embarrassingly obligated to quote the old cliche of Mark Twain’s that “There are three kinds of falsehoods: lies, damned lies, and statistics.” I’m not a denier of the importance of statistics and I use simple statistics in my work, but as the classic cautionary book “How To Lie With Statistics” instructed, there are numerous ways to grossly misrepresent the truth and yet be statistically correct, with one of them being a questionably modeled poll as noted in the above post.