UN Declares Genocide in Gaza While 250 US Lawmakers Are in Israel
It is surely in the interest of the public to know if their local representatives were in Israel networking with parties to what the UN has labeled a genocide.
FAIR is the national progressive media watchdog group, challenging corporate media bias, spin and misinformation.


It is surely in the interest of the public to know if their local representatives were in Israel networking with parties to what the UN has labeled a genocide.


The UN’s Albanese has long opposed Israel’s genocide of Palestinians—but what broke US warmongers was her naming corporations profiting from that genocide.


“Why hasn’t something happened to stop the killing already? And the displacement of 90% of the population?”


The Washington Post argued that rules needn’t apply to the West and its allies, since they have the “means [and] mechanisms to investigate themselves.”


The New York Times offered no rebuttal from any international law scholar to the US claim that the ceasefire resolution was “nonbinding.”


Janine Jackson interviewed IPS’s Phyllis Bennis about the Gaza ceasefire resolution for the March 29, 2024, episode of CounterSpin. This is a lightly edited transcript. Janine Jackson: Reuters reported on March 22 that the United Nations Security Council had rejected a resolution, proposed by the US, calling for a ceasefire in Gaza, and […]


A senior UN human rights official says there is a “plausible” case that Israel is using starvation as a weapon of war in Gaza, a war crime.


Establishment media in the US were slow to cover South Africa’s charge—initially providing the public with thin to no reporting on the case.


Rather than exposing CCS as the greenwashing ploy it essentially is, some reporting added to confusion and misunderstandings.


Shouldn’t the press corps be actively involved in informing us about the person third in line for the presidency?


“If the press would do its work and inform people about the treaty…then maybe these countries could be prodded to sign.”


By omitting the devastating impact of sanctions, corporate media attribute sole responsibility for economic and humanitarian conditions to the Venezuelan government, thereby using the misery provoked by sanctions to validate the infliction of even more misery.


“These wrongs and these crimes, if they are not investigated and prosecuted, then most likely this will happen again in the next armed conflict the United States will be involved in.”


“Americans don’t want it, but it’s happening anyway; next!” seems to be corporate media’s approach to the nomination of arch-conservative Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court.


Why arbitrarily audit a handful of the 164 countries that didn’t support the US, rather than characterize their broader makeup?


For a news story that promises to be about a conservative candidate’s TV commercial, ABC sure delivered.


It’s no secret that the Washington Post editorial page was quite alarmed by Venezuela’s shift to the left under former President Hugo Chavez. The Post–like the rest of elite US media (Extra!, 11/05)–was an unrelenting critic of Chavez’s policies. Some things haven’t changed. In a scathing editorial (9/20/14), the Post went after Chavez’s successor Nicolas Maduro, […]


When it comes to the death toll in Gaza, the Washington Post and New York Times both work hard to muddy up the picture.


Vilifying left-leaning Latin American and Caribbean leaders is nothing new from the US media–from Chile’s Salvador Allende to Jean-Bertrand Aristide of Haiti, from Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez to Mauricio Funes of El Salvador. Bolivian President Evo Morales is no exception, as he caught the attention of the website Vox, a new outlet that sets out to “explain the news” with an emphasis on data analysis.


If international law is so important in evaluating Syria’s actions, then shouldn’t it be equally important in evaluating the proposed US response?

FAIR is the national progressive media watchdog group, challenging corporate media bias, spin and misinformation. We work to invigorate the First Amendment by advocating for greater diversity in the press and by scrutinizing media practices that marginalize public interest, minority and dissenting viewpoints. We expose neglected news stories and defend working journalists when they are muzzled. As a progressive group, we believe that structural reform is ultimately needed to break up the dominant media conglomerates, establish independent public broadcasting and promote strong non-profit sources of information.
Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting
124 W. 30th Street, Suite 201
New York, NY 10001
Tel: 212-633-6700
We rely on your support to keep running. Please consider donating.